|
Climate
protection would actually reduce costs, not raise them …
because saving fossil fuel is a lot cheaper than buying it.
—Amory
Lovins, Scientific American, 2005
If
peak-oil proponents are the pessimists of the
energy world, physicists are the optimists. Peak-oil buffs believe
that having less oil will “end civilization as we know it,”
while energy guru Amory Lovins tells us that “oil problems will
fade away” and that “displacing most, probably all, of
our oil … makes money.” Lovins thinks oil production
will peak because we’ll realize it’s a waste of money and
largely stop using it. Is he right about this? ...
|
|