z Facts.com
 KNOW THE FACTS.  GET THE SOURCE.
About Printable
 
 
  Home
Energy Policy
Energy Book
Chapters / Notes
Old Chapters
Appendix
1 Once upon a Time
2 Wreck Economy?
3 Peak Oil?
4 Global Warming?
5 Free, Cheaper?
6 No Free Lunch?
7 Energy Plan
8 Learn from OPEC
9 World Oil Market
10 Corn vs Climate
11 Synfuels Again?
12 China + Coal
13 Charge OPEC
14 Tax = Market?
15 Cap Politics
16 A Carbon Untax
17 Untax Works
18 Untax is Fair
19 An Oil Untax
20 Fuel Economy
21 Future Tech
22 Throw Money ?
23 Kyoto Broken
24 Global C Price
25 World Cap?
26 Enforcement
29 Consumer Cartel ♦
 
  Don’t Miss:
 
 National Debt Graph

US National Government Debt

A Social Security Crisis?

Iraq War Reasons

Hurricanes & Global Warming

Crude Oil Price

Gas Prices

Corn Ethanol
 
   

Row function does not exist: metaPage/progRow/.php, displayRow_.
Row function does not exist: metaPage/progRow/.php, displayRow_.
    Home > Energy Policy > Energy Book > Chapters / Notes > Old Chapters > 29 Consumer Cartel
 
Resolution
 
  Previous: Fear Itself  
  Of all the controversies that we’ll address, the debate over whether a strong energy-security and climate-stability policy will wreck the economy has the simplest and most definitive resolution. If people implement such a policy at all sensibly, it will not come anywhere near wrecking the economy. The policy could even be free, though we should not count on that.

All serious studies of this question come to roughly the same conclusion for solid reasons. Fossil fuel, though one of the most important inputs to our economy, still costs less than 5 percent of income in a bad year. Moreover, energy policies are aimed at decreasing fossil-fuel use, which saves money even before you count the resulting decrease in the price of oil on the world market. There is simply no chance that a sensible but effective policy will reverse economic growth. It will likely make us 1 or 2 percent poorer—not counting environmental and security benefits—than we would be at some future time, when the world will be much richer than it is now.

Finally, it is helpful to compare these policy costs with projected energy costs over time. The DOE has projected energy costs as a percentage of income through 2030, as shown in Figure 2. The curve continues its historical downward trend into the future, not because energy will get cheaper, but because the country will continue to get rich faster than energy costs rise. The red line shows an energy policy that ramps up to 1 percent of GDP in 2020 and stays at that level. Notice that even when the DOE takes into account the costs of such an aggressive policy, it predicts that energy costs relative to national income will be close to an all-time low in 2030. “Wrecking the economy” is one fear we can lay to rest.
 
 
book-1-1-energy-gdp
Figure 2. The DOE predicts that energy expenditures, as a percentage of income, will fall in the future. Even with an aggressive energy policy, reaching 1% of GDP by 2020, total energy and energy-policy expenditures should be lower in 2030 than in most of the previous sixty years.
 
  Previous: Fear Itself  
 
 
poppy-s
poppy-s
poppy-s
poppy-s
poppy-s
 
 


http://zfacts.com/p/877.html | 01/18/12 07:29 GMT
Modified: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 22:38:12 GMT
  Bookmark and Share  
 
.