z Facts.com
 KNOW THE FACTS.  GET THE SOURCE.
About Printable
 
 
  Home
Energy Policy
Green Energy
Ethanol
Subsidies
Subsidy Calcs
Blender's Credit
Price Subsidy
Total Cost ♦
Economics
 
  Don’t Miss:
 
 National Debt Graph

US National Government Debt

A Social Security Crisis?

Iraq War Reasons

Hurricanes & Global Warming

Crude Oil Price

Gas Prices

Corn Ethanol
 
   
 
Who gets the corn-ethanol subsidies (3)
Ethanol Chapter
 
 
 

Total Direct and Indirect Subsidies

The indirect subsidy to ethanol on the 4.9 billion gallons produced in 2006 comes to $3.9 billion. Together with the direct subsidies of $0.9 billion for corn and $2.5 billion for ethanol the grand total is $7.3 billion. That's $1.50 per gallon of ethanol, or $2.28 per gallon of gasoline replaced.

In 2006, the total subsidies for ethanol came to roughly $7.3 billion, which is $1.50 per gallon of ethanol produced or $2.28 per gallon of gasoline replaced.

These subsidies have produced an enormous boom in ethanol. Between August 2006 and January 2007, the capacity of existing plants and plants under construction grew from 7.4 billion gallons to 11.4 billion, a 54% increase in six months. Collins (USDA, 2006) describes the state of the market as ethanol euphoria.

The Cost of Subsidies

Subsidies are not the same as social cost. One man's tax payment is another man's profit. Social cost measures the use of the nation's resources, such as labor, capital, and energy. Collecting income tax and putting the money into the pockets of ethanol producers does not use up any resources, and is not a net cost to society, but it is a cost to tax payers.

    Unfortunately there is no accurate public data on the excess profits of ethanol producers. For the sake of discussion, suppose the chief economist of the USDA is right that ethanol costs $1.65 per gallon to produce (USDA, 2007b). Gasoline with the same energy cost 38¢ less in 2006, so the social cost of using ethanol instead of gasoline is 38¢ per gallon of ethanol. This does not include the costs and benefits of externalities; those must be compared against this market-based social cost. The rest of the $1.50 per gallon subsidy, or $5.4 billion in total, lines the pockets of real farmers, corporate farmers, and ethanol distillers. In the following table, the "Apparent Cost" refers to the total cost of subsidies and the "Real Social Cost" refers to the extra, market-determined cost of using ethanol in place of gasoline. The costs shown are based on the calculations of GHG and energy import reductions discussed above.

2006 Cost Increase from:
Real Social Cost
Apparent Cost
Reducing fossil imports by the energy in
1 barrel of crude oil
$33
$131
Reducing CO2 emissions by 1 ton
$478
$1,881

The reader may believe the USDA has misestimated the cost of ethanol production. In this case, the choice is between believing more than $5.4 billion went to windfall profits, or believing real social costs are higher than indicated in the table above. They cannot both be lower; the $7.3 billion in subsidies went somewhere.

    The corn-ethanol subsidies create a net flow of money from the rest of the country to the corn states. Just as advertised, this creates wealth and jobs in these states. But spending more in corn states means spending less in other states, which reduces employment in the states that pay for the corn-ethanol market euphoria.

 
 
 
poppy-s
poppy-s
poppy-s
poppy-s
poppy-s
 
 


http://zfacts.com/p/804.html | 01/18/12 07:22 GMT
Modified: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 02:03:54 GMT
  Bookmark and Share  
 
.