z Facts.com
 KNOW THE FACTS.  GET THE SOURCE.
About Printable
 
 
  Home
Politics
Obama Clinton
Michigan ♦
Till June
Rush for Clinton
Clinton's Edge?
Attacks by Clinton
vs. McCain
Polls
Health Care
Sexism?
Solutions ?
Experience ?
 
  Don’t Miss:
 
 National Debt Graph

US National Government Debt

A Social Security Crisis?

Iraq War Reasons

Hurricanes & Global Warming

Crude Oil Price

Gas Prices

Corn Ethanol
 
   
 
Hillary Changes the Rules after the Game's Over
 
  Is an Election Fair when No One Can Vote for Your Opponent?
They could only vote for Clinton. No write-ins were allowed. Hillary says that's completely fair. She should get all her delegates and Obama should get none. But at the DNC meeting, all of Clinton's supporters backed down on that, and demanded only a 73-55 split.
That would have given her 57% although she won on 55% of the popular vote. But many Democrats who could not vote for Obama or Edwards voted Republican because they wanted to help McCain over Romney and Huckabee. In fact so many voters were discouraged, especially those who could not vote for their candidate, that Michigan had only a third the turnout of similar primaries.
The best statistician in the business, who combines all poll results, estimates that Obama would have actually won by a whisker if his name had been a fair election. And Hillary was given 69 out of 128 or 54% of the delegates.
The DNC was willing to give Obama more delegates in both Florida and Michigan, but Obama instructed his representatives not to accept such a favorable settlement.
Clinton bucked Democratic pressure and kept her name on the ballot, while Obama and Edwards took their's off. Here's what she said on TV as she did that:
I personally did not think it made any difference, uh, whether or not my name was on the ballot. You know, it's clear: this election they're having is not going to count for anything.  MP4 video  QuickTime video  YouTube
Of course she knew it would almost certainly count for something, and she knew by cheating a bit, she'd likely gain an advantage. But by her own words, it should not have counted and she should have gain no advantage.

It was Harold Ickes and other Clinton operatives at the DNC who stripped FL of its delegates. Clinton held tremendous potential leverage over this decision, and not just because she was considered the likely nominee. Of the committee's 30 members, a near majority of 12 were Clinton supporters. All of them—most notably strategist Harold Ickes—voted for Florida's full disenfranchisement.

Mrs. Clinton’s victory [in Florida] was expected and may have largely reflected her prominence on the national political scene for almost two decades. She did well among those who cast their votes early; among late deciders, Mr. Obama matched her almost one for one, according to exit polls conducted by Edison/Mitofsky. [NY Times]

http://www.mlive.com/news/index.ssf/2008/01/feasting_on_politics.html
 
 
 
poppy-s
poppy-s
poppy-s
poppy-s
poppy-s
 
 


http://zfacts.com/p/1006.html | 01/18/12 07:19 GMT
Modified: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:45:42 GMT
  Bookmark and Share  
 
.